Until this post I was not aware of your gender. But I had the impression that you were more likely male and female. I hope that is not a negative revelation.
The only reason I mention it is that it now occurs to me that you may derive some benefit from reading the life story of Rosaria Champagne Butterfield if you have not already. (I have only heard her testimony - approximately one hour - on the Focus on the Family radio program.)
Until this post I was not aware of your gender. But I had the impression that you were more likely male and female. I hope that is not a negative revelation.
The only reason I mention it is that it now occurs to me that you may derive some benefit from reading the life story of Rosaria Champagne Butterfield if you have not already. (I have only heard her testimony - approximately one hour - on the Focus on the Family radio program.)
Don't worry, most people are of the assumption I'm male here. I don't mind it at all.
This is the first time I've heard of Butterfield. I'll definitely look into her story and read some of her works!
“....more likely male THAN female.”